This blog is not normally about politics but the 2016 season is so volatile that a few word seemed in order.
No matter who is elected, most things in this life will not change much. Social unrest will continue, political corruption will continue, the bureaucracies will still be in place, influencing many aspects of business and private living. Freedom of speech and religion will continue but possibly with some alterations. Will there be censorship or harassment on speech and religion? Of course, there is now. Will some people experience discrimination, harassment or pain over it? Of course, it's happening now. Can politics fix or repair these issues? Yes and No.
Changing the political environmnet at the national level can help with some issues, expecially in state operated or funded institutions, but at more local levels, very little will change to keep in step with the national unless there is a cultural shift at the local level. For believers, the whole political repsonsiblity is to pray for our leaders that they do the things that do not interfer with a peacable life.
I have not been updating this blog due to working on book manuscripts. I have four manuscripts underfoot. I have one in the review and editing stage. A proposed cover is show at the left.
This book presents the supernatural power of holy spirit resident within all believers at new birth. The function and activity of holy spirit has seldom been understood by believers who understand Jesus Christ as a "divine self-help guru."
From the back cover:
The Supernatural Believer, is book two in a series about the nature of the Christian believer. This book unravels misconceptions about holy spirit and its work in every believer. Once this is understood, the believer can rise from a supplicant in the Christian Faith, to a believer endued with spiritual power and authority … one who truly has made Jesus Christ Lord in his life.
The spiritual abilities addressed in this book are what typically have been called “gifts of the spirit” but as we present here, that label derives from tradition and pop-theology, not from scripture. This essay presents a biblical and Hebraic view of these spiritual matters filtered through the lens of cultural anthropology as a way to understand the text as its original audience would have understood them.
I'm hoping to publish before the end of 2016.
Update October 3, 2016: I am likely to miss my publish date due to extended manuscript review.
I wrote the book, The Unorthodox Believer, but you might be one too. This is some one who cares about the original biblical message and getting it right. The unorthodox believer cares more about the original message of scripture than fitting into a religious scheme or fitting into a social structure. For the Unorthodox Believer, truth is more important than tradition or status quo.
The book explores the cultural manner in which we modern westerns think versus the thinking patterns of the ancient easterners who wrote our scriptures. It explores how modern orthodoxy was invented via the logic argument methods of the ancient Greek philosophers — the educational background of the early century theologians. Then it contrasts that with the manner in which the ancient Hebrew believers derived their beliefs, based on their Hebrew background. Essentially, modern Christian beliefs were derived from Greek and Romans studying the biblical texts with no regard for the Hebraic culture.
To say it that way, makes the whole process of converting an ancient Hebrew faith into a modern gentile faith seems like the modern version is on a shaky foundation. And it is. However, every culture must understand the message of God's salvation for His people. It must be understandable to the intended audience. Introducing ideas completely foreign to a culture is a sure way to be misunderstood. When we read and study our Bibles, we are reading God's message intended for the ancient Hebrew culture, as it was, at a certain time in history. However, we are at a different time in history and in a very different culture. Without understanding the original message as given, we might not understand how to translate it correctly into our culture and I believe we have missed a lot.